Conquer the CAS Challenge 2025 – Your Ultimate Actuarial Adventure Awaits!

Question: 1 / 400

What could indicate a moral hazard in direct damage coverage requests?

Excessive claims history

Requests for high policy limits

The scenario of a moral hazard is pertinent in insurance contexts, particularly when assessing the behavior of policyholders and the associated risks they may present. When a policyholder requests high policy limits in direct damage coverage, it could suggest that they might have an increased tendency to engage in risky behavior, believing they are protected by that coverage. This situation is indicative of moral hazard because the policyholder may feel less incentive to avoid loss or damage when they are covered by high limits, possibly leading to an increased likelihood of filing questionable claims.

High policy limits can reflect a lack of concern for risk management since the perceived financial backing could encourage irresponsible actions. Essentially, the higher the coverage limit requested, the greater the potential for a policyholder to believe they are insulated from the consequences of their actions. This mindset may lead to situations where they do not take reasonable precautions to prevent losses, thereby creating a moral hazard.

In understanding this concept, other options such as excessive claims history or frequent changes in ownership may signal risks or instability but do not directly indicate a moral hazard arising from the specifics of coverage limits and policyholder behavior. The geographic location of the business can also indicate different levels of risk but does not pertain to the behavior of the insured that might promote risk-taking.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Frequent changes in ownership

Geographic location of the business

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy